🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an global treaty created to safeguard females from violence, including domestic abuse, following extensive and intense discussions in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in Riga this past week to oppose the decision. The final authority now lies with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to establish laws and support services to eliminate all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to begin the process of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a action sponsored by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the main political groups advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has called on the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked widespread protest both within Latvia and internationally.

22,000 people have signed a Latvian appeal demanding the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a protest for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Possible Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a rash decision driven by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty in 2021, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds support, the president could potentially send back the bill for further consideration if he holds concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics stated on social media that he would assess the vote according to legal principles, "taking into account state and legal factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout Europe," stated a human rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in multiple European nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could influence comparable debates in other member states