🔗 Share this article

The US Justice Department has made another attempt to obtain access to grand jury records from the investigation into the late financier, which culminated in his federal indictment in 2019.

Lawmakers' Decision Spurs Fresh Legal Effort

The newly submitted petition, prepared by the government lawyer for the Manhattan district, asserts that legislators made it clear when approving the release of case documents that these legal files should be unsealed.

"The legislative move took precedence over standing rules in a manner that enables the disclosure of the sealed testimony," explained the government lawyers.

Timing Elements

The filing requested the Manhattan federal court to act promptly in releasing the materials, noting the 30-day window set after the measure was approved last week.

Earlier Motion Faced Refusal

However, this current initiative comes after a earlier motion from the previous administration was turned down by Judge Richard Berman, who referenced a "important and persuasive factor" for maintaining the documents sealed.

In his recent judgment, the judge observed that the limited documentation of sealed records and exhibits, featuring a PowerPoint presentation, phone records, and letters from survivors and their attorneys, are minimal compared to the authorities' extensive accumulation of investigative documents.

"The authorities' massive collection of Epstein files overwhelm the limited grand jury materials," stated Berman in his ruling, stating that the motion appeared to be a "distraction" from making public files already in the prosecution's control.

Nature of the Federal Jury Materials

The sealed records largely contain the testimony of an government agent, who served as the only witness in the sealed sessions and reportedly had "no direct knowledge of the case details" with testimony that was "mostly hearsay."

Security Considerations

The magistrate pointed to the "potential dangers to survivors' security and privacy" as the compelling reason for maintaining the materials under seal.

Parallel Proceedings

A comparable petition to unseal sealed witness accounts involving the prosecution of his accomplice was also denied, with the judicial officer noting that the federal petition incorrectly implied the sealed records contained an "undiscovered wealth of undisclosed information" about the case.

Current Events

The latest petition comes soon after the appointment of a recently assigned lawyer to investigate the financier's connections with influential political figures and a few months after the firing of one of the main lawyers working on the proceedings.

When inquired about how the active inquiry might affect the release of case materials in government possession, the Attorney General stated: "We cannot comment on that because it is now a ongoing inquiry in the New York district."